Posted by
Aaron Craig on Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:10:12 PM
Bias in
media is unavoidable. Sloppiness is
not. When a journalist presents a
statistic an alarm bell should always ring in the mind of the consumer. Journalists have an Achilles heel in their
constant urge to satisfy ego. To be the
one that exposed a particular “crisis” and be portrayed as intellectual and
caring is the primary goal of entering the fourth estate. From Journalism 101 on, budding “protectors”
are told that without them the world would collapse into anarchy. An almost “Jedi Knight” mindset is found
throughout the field and this creates a need in the mind of a reporter to
expose the “Dark Side” and save the unwashed, brainless peasants. The diligent journalist will research a
target in detail and connect particular events to show a wrong has been
committed. The sloppy journalist will
use statistics. Events are open to
interpretation and can be debated.
Statistics, once reported, are as intellectually effective as “yeah
huh!” in debate. This is because
reporters rarely investigate the details and context of the numbers, preferring
to simply pick a number that fits the template of their story.
On July 18th
Steve Brown of FOX News did a report on John Edwards and poverty. He reported to the flock that 24 million
people were in poverty in 1968 when Robert Kennedy championed the cause of the
poor. He then enlightened us to the
horrifying fact that the number of impoverished Americans has skyrocketed to 37
million now, making Edwards right to believe this is an issue to take him to
the presidency. The numbers are accurate
on the face, but very misleading in their support of Brown’s story. The population of the United
States was 200,706,052 in 1968. A calculator tells me that this puts the
poverty rate at 11.95%. The population
of the United States
now is 302,383,503. My calculator, which
I assure you all is a very reliable source, tells me that the current poverty
rate is 12.2%. Considering the
re-defining of the poverty rate (always up), the ravages of the Great Society,
illegal immigration and Jimmy Carter I would submit that these numbers are very
encouraging.
Continuing
to read from John Edwards PR pamphlet on television, Brown recites the oldie
but goodie “women and minorities hardest hit” play with the fact that blacks
and Hispanics are three times more likely to live in poverty. But this demographic lives almost entirely in
cities where the Great Society ensures a high poverty rate. At least 10 million of the 37 million impoverished
today are illegal aliens who arrived because they were in poverty in the first
place, not because they are victims of the American system. This is an outlier when examining poverty as
a result of American capitalism and places my new adjusted rate at 8.93%. Using the Global Warming Scientific Method I
can sum up my research with a number I pulled out of my butt that says the
poverty rate is actually 2%. Let’s
party!
So another
media fueled crises turns out to be a mirage.
Emotions and faulty connections of logic are weaved into the typical Socialist
pretzel and crammed down our throats for a political agenda. Imagine what journalists do to numbers they
can control when reporting on
polling? The devil is in the
details.