Understanding the mindset of a socialist requires understanding how the creature sees and processes words.  Perhaps the most telling example is the term “human rights”.  Most would maintain that “human rights” refers to basic dignities afforded to every human.   Not so.  Looking for protests of the obvious and multiple violations of the Geneva Conventions by Iran in the taking of British hostages, I found no reference to the event whatsoever on Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International.  The MoveOn.Org Congress is silent and Speaker Pelosi is planning a vacation in Syria.  Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro are not offering free heating oil to the families of the hostages.  However, both have committed to light a dissident family on fire for a vigil this weekend and to imprison and torture one journalist a week until Britain relents and admits to swimming in Iran’s pool. 

            “Human rights” within the lexicon of socialism means “preference given to those who agree with the Politburo”.  An example would be Stalin’s giddy sacrifice to starvation of the Ukraine in order to guarantee “human rights” to the “Party” people of Moscow.  There are variations.  Human rights can also mean the rights of illegal immigrants to become a permanent underclass of indentured servants and slaves because they “just want a better life”.  In this case the human rights of the voters, I mean “undocumented immigrants”, trumps the rights of Mexicans to keep enough capable people in their own country to clean up their own corrupt government and create a better life for themselves not involving a lifetime of washing dishes trying to pick up English.  Much like Stalin in the Ukraine, socialists in America are content to destroy the families of Mexico for “human rights” and affordable lawn care (see Black America).  It was American socialists who de-funded the military in Vietnam so that the population of that country could finally get its “not-so-human right” of torture and mass murder.  Castro, Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Ho Chi Minh and Yassar Arafat are among the experts historically defining who in fact is human and therefore entitled to “human rights”.  A good template: fascist terrorist held at Gitmo who targets civilians=human; British Soldier=notsomuch.