Fool me once, shame on…wow, I almost bought it.  I find myself shocked that even a cynic like me, who enjoys warm evenings by the fire ripping the mainstream media, would fall for the very media technique I so love to expose to friends and family.  Confident lectures (by me) describing the techniques of “journalists” were apparently lost on (of all people) me. 

I feel I almost know Ann Coulter.  Her intricately researched work on the life and timeline of socialism in America was an inspiration to me.  But when the reports came rolling down of her performance at CPAC I was rehearsing a “put it down and slowly back away” strategy.  Then I heard the rest of the speech. 

Ann is right.  Edwards is a wimp.  The term she used is “faggot”.  If we were kids on the playground I have no doubt that John Edwards would be without lunch money daily.  Notice in the definition it says “gay or effeminate man”.  Edwards is obviously not gay, so… 

But, of course, that is really not the point.

Can anybody who heard the whole speech (especially other references to the subject of homosexuality) truly say they know her now as a screaming homophobe?  Ridiculous.  This is beyond the pale for outright lying, even for the media.  We are also being shown just how far this Orwellian nightmare in pc “groupspeak” has come.  Why even waste keyboard time on the flaming hypocrisy of our Democrat Party, whose Senior Klan-Man Senator used the term “white niggers” multiple times on network prime time television (I hope the quotation marks keep me out of rehab).  See?  Get it?  I think you do, but it’s not funny, is it?

Sorry, Ann.